Modern Household Energy in Rural China Changed Substantially

The blue column chart showed that in nontypical heating zones (Southeast and Central Southern China), the changing trend of FH kept increasing from 1992 to 2017, which was largely driven by economic growth. Then the red column chart represented the FH in typical heating zones (Northern and Western China) with no obvious changing trend in the study period. Lastly, the yellow one showed the FH in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei and Fenwei Plain with intervention policy rose significantly.

Globally there are nearly 2.8 billion people using traditional solid fuels like biomass and coals for daily cooking and heating, producing large amounts of incomplete burning products of which many are toxic, harmful to human health, but also affect climate change. Access to affordable modern energy is an important goal of sustainable development. For a long time, household energy use in rural areas is lacking of reliable systematic surveys in many developing countries. Recently, a team with experts from nearly 30 universities and research institutes in China conducted a nationwide household survey to evaluate household energy consumption structure of rural residents in China (Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan are not covered in the present study).

On the left, it showed the spatial distribution of the clean cooking energy source fraction across the country in 2017. The fractions in Southeastern China were significantly higher than other regions due to its relatively higher economic level. On the right is the most widely used energy source (coal, biomass or clean energy) for space heating and its time-sharing fraction. In North China, the most widely used fuel in heating was coal. In Southwestern China, it was biomass. Only in several coastal cities in Southeastern China, it was clean energy that the most widely used heating fuel. Note: Data from Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan are temporarily unavailable in this study.

In most rural homes, people often use more than one single energy in their life. A family may use electricity or gas to cook, but meanwhile coal or biomass to heat house. Considering the ubiquitous phenomenon of “energy stacking”, the researchers adopted a new method of “time-sharing fractions of different fuels” in the study to avoid the potential bias caused by a single-energy survey method. Results showed that, on average, each household used 3 different types of fuels for cooking and heating. Meanwhile, from 1992 to 2017, the average time sharing of modern energy such as electricity and gas in the cooking and heating activities in rural China continued to increase, and the electrification level of cooking was significantly higher than that of heating.

According to the study, for daily cooking, the time-sharing of E&G was on the rise, with a national average of 69% in 2017, but there were significant regional differences. Household income level was an important influencing factor, which can explain about 88% of the inter-provincial differences. In areas with higher economic level, E&G were used for cooking in a longer time. While, for space heating, though the national average of time-sharing of E&G was also increasing gradually, the fraction in 2017 was only about 20%. The traditional solid fuels still predominated the heating energy. The time-sharing and changing trend of E&G for the space heating had obvious spatial variations.

The left were the time-sharing fractions of clean cooking energy source, and the right were of heating. Both of cooking and heating showed a constantly upward trend from 1992 to 2017. However, the fractions of cooking were significantly higher than those of heating.

In the Southeast and Central Southern China, driven by factors like economic growth, the time-sharing of E&G for space heating increased obviously, however, in the north area, unless those under the national clean heating intervention policies, most households still relied on coals or biomass for space heating in cold seasons, and this did not change obviously over the past. Specially, in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region and Fenwei Plain, after the implementation of the clean heating action, the effect of the intervention policy was very obvious, as seen from significant increases of the time-sharing of E&G in heating activities. Moreover, the study found that the clean heating policy also effectively accelerated the clean energy transition in cooking energy at the city level.

When it came to the fuel consumption, in comparison with that in 2012, the consumption of biomass and coals for cooking and heating in rural China dropped by about 45% and 12% in 2017, respectively, while the use of natural gas more than doubled in the five years. The changes are different for cooking and heating activities. For cooking, the consumption of solid fuels such as coal and biomass fuels were decreasing, while the consumption of gas kept rising. For heating activities, the reduction of biomass consumption was very significant in the country.

At present, the level of electrification in rural China has been significantly improved. However, there is still a long way to go before achieving the goal of sustainable development in 2030, and the difficulty of subsequent increments will be further increased, requiring more efforts from the whole society.

No Comments Yet

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

©2022 Global Security Wire. Use Our Intel. All Rights Reserved. Washington, D.C.